The future of industrial hemp looks bright as experts outline its potential at the 2021 National Hemp Symposium.

Industry experts from various private and governmental sectors convened this week for the first-ever virtual 2021 National Hemp Symposium, brought to life by the National Academies of Sciences Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources (BANR) and Oregon State University’s Global Hemp Innovation Center (GHIC).

National Industrial Hemp Council (NIHC)’s board member Patricia Sheikh, Senior Vice President of Roots of Peace, moderated the two-day event, along with organizers Jay Noller, Director and Lead Researcher, and Jeffrey Steiner, Associate Director, both of the GHIC. Sectors represented included energy/biofuel, automotive, environmental, USDA, food and nutrition, apparel, manufacturing, banking, food and pharma and defense.

The event explored industrial hemp potential as an up-and-coming top U.S. commodity on the national and international stage. Presenters outlined uses and opportunities from their sectors that could be significant streams of income for U.S. producers with adequate supply to meet demand – a concern cited by most of the presenters. Things such as wood replacement in construction, desirable fiber in apparel, and automotive parts were highlighted. 3M is testing alternative uses of hemp in their manufacturing as part of their commitment to sustainability.

The outlook is exciting and hemp is seen as a top contender that could significantly stimulate the American economy, once obstacles are removed.

NIHC’s Patrick Atagi presented an informative session on hemp commerce that reflected this potential. “We can absolutely change the world with hemp, it is amazing. There are so many ways to succeed,” he noted.

“Yet, there are many obstacles to getting hemp product to market, such as transportation,” Atagi continued. “Working at the national level to influence the Drug Enforcement Agency on their view of hemp enforcement will open up commerce.

“The federal and most state governments are not opposed to hemp. As an example, NIHC recently received $200,000 to promote U.S. hemp internationally through the USDA Market Access Program. NIHC is also pursuing a domestic marketing program through a national hemp checkoff initiative. A hemp checkoff has the potential to positively impact the industry in a substantive way similar to the ‘Got Milk’ campaign and ‘Pork the other White Meat’ checkoffs.”

In addition to protecting the hemp brand and marketing, which includes combatting negative attacks with positive data and facts, NIHC sees its role as a partner with the government, especially through participation on working committees. “As a recognized partner with USDA, it puts NIHC at the table in international negotiations, with their seal of approval. To be competitive in these markets, like Asia and Europe, we need solid research on what those unique consumers want, what they like, to avoid the unintended consequences of not knowing.”

Ultimately, there are many hurdles including standardization, certification, and testing here in the U.S. that must be addressed, says Atagi. “The consumer has right to know what they are buying and to feel safe. They want to know ‘what do I buy’ and ‘how much do I take.’”

Bonny Jo Peterson of the Industrial Hemp Association of Washington, and co-presenter to Atagi’s session, agreed. “We want to grow, harvest and automate an industrial hemp crop for a sustainable market, which produces a quality product that people can trust. We really need standardized testing and labs. We need to all be on the same playing field.”

Dr. Dionne Toombs, USDA, outlined their efforts to do “worldwide testing and research in our labs.”They are investing $66 million in an Agricultural Research Service lab intended to enhance research, which will include hemp, she says. Toombs also referenced the Farm Bill of 2018’s provision for National Institute of Food and Agriculture hemp research investmentsand the Supplemental and Alternative Crops (SAC) Competitive Grants Program, both which have their challenges and limitations, but are moving the needle in the right direction.

Looking ahead, Toombs says, “We are facing a future of challenges that will hurt us, that are attacking our natural resources.” She believes boosting ag productivity and helping to develop innovative solutions to maintain our leadership across the globe are the keys to the future, in which hemp has a role. She cited funding and resources, realigning priorities with the New administration, food and nutrition standards, and having enough data to make decisions as current USDA obstacles.

Symposium participant Deanie Elsner, CEO of Charlotte’s Web – a market leader in hemp-derived CBD extract products – made an impactful plea for regulations and standardization, an issue the plagues her business. “Have you ever known a CEO for the largest company in a segment begging for research? Well I am here begging. We have to get data in order to give the FDA comfort to move forward,”she said in regards to the need for regulatory certainty and an affirmative statement for CBD in dietary supplements.

She believes the mega-trend she calls a “wellness awakening” – a move from sick care to well care – is driving increasing consumer interest in hemp products. “In the end, we have this amazing plant that has potential to help millions around the world. It is up to us to make sure they have the access to full spectrum hemp extract. Research studies are needed. Research is the only thing that will get us through this, and lack of FDA regulation has been quite a challenge.”

 

 

HEMP CHECKOFF

ABSTRACT:

At the end of 2020, the National Industrial Hemp Council (NIHC) and Hemp Industry Association (HIA) reached out and surveyed a sample of industry stakeholders including; farmers, oil, seed, CBD processors,seed companies, importers and exporters, and others involved in the hemp industry. The goal was to get their opinions on a hemp check off program. We found there is a high level of overall interest and support for the concept of a national hemp checkoff. The positive results of the survey have encouraged us to proceed on a hemp checkoff program. Please read on to learn about the details of the results.

_______________________________________________________________________

INTRODUCTION:

The NIHC and HIA used our respective membership and communications resources to distribute a survey regarding establishment of a checkoff for the hemp industry to hemp industry stakeholders. The NIHC also asked chief economist Beau Whitney of Whitney Economics to distribute the survey to his email list of over 7,500 hemp farmers and producers. NIHC also worked with the online media and marketing group “Let’s Talk Hemp” to distribute the survey to their readers. The Let’s Talk Hemp newsletter has a distribution of 20,000 plus subscribers. HIA also secured an article in Hemp Industry Daily (HID) that promoted the survey and encouraged readers to reply with their opinions. The survey generated 270 responses.

 

METHOD:

We conducted the survey from November 30, 2020 until December 31, 2020 through the online portal Survey Monkey. Using the platform Survey Monkey allowed us to efficiently share the survey and industry stakeholders to easily provide their feedback on issues facing the U.S. hemp industry.

 

RESULTS:

The following are the questions asked and the survey responses generated.

1.  On a scale of 1-5, where 1 is strongly disagree and 5 is strongly agree, how do you feel about the following statement: I believe that the hemp industry needs additional research in the areas of seed development, agronomics, or fiber, grain or oil or CBD processing? 

 

Over 80 percent of respondents either strongly agreed or agreed on the need for additional research in seed development, agronomics, fiber, grain and CBD and/or oil processing. It’s worth noting that those in the industry who either strongly disagreed or disagreed with that statement was at 10 percent or less for each research area.

 

2. On a scale of 1-5, where 1 is strongly disagree and 5 is strongly agree, how do you feel about the following statement: I would support a promotion program to expand the market for industrial hemp fiber, grain, oil or CBD, and their uses and applications?

 

There was strong support for promotion of hemp and hemp-derived products. Over 80 percent of respondents either agreed or strongly agreed on the need for a promotion program for hemp fiber products and oil and CBD products. Two-thirds of respondents agreed on the need for a promotion program for seed related products and when combined with those respondents who only agreed, the level of support for promoting seeds was just shy of 80 percent. It’s worth noting that the level of support for promoting oil and CBD products was strongest out of all three subgroups.

 

3. On a scale of 1-5, where 1 is strongly disagree and 5 is strongly agree how do you feel about the following statement: I would support a consumer education program to educate consumers about hemp generally and, more specifically about hemp fiber, grain, oil or CBD, and their uses, benefits and applications?

 

The intensity of support for consumer education was strongest out of all survey questions. For hemp generally, nearly 80 percent of all respondents strongly agreed on the need for more consumer education. With regards to oil and CBD products, approximately three out of every four respondents agreed on the need for more consumer education. The need for consumer education for hemp-derived fiber products was over 30 percent. While support for consumer education of grain products was roughly two-thirds, combined with those who both agreed and strongly agreed the level of support was nearly 80 percent.

All told, nearly eight out of every ten respondents of the surveyed either agreed or very strongly agreed on the need for more consumer education.

 

4. On a scale of 1-5, where 1 is strongly disagree and 5 is strongly agree how do you feel about the following statement: I would support a nominal assessment (e.g., less than 1% of value) to support an industry research, consumer education and promotion program to support the industrial hemp industry?

 

 

While support for a nominal assessment of less than one percent of the farm value was not as intense as support for research, education and promotion, it’s worth noting that less than 20 percent of the industry collectively voiced opposition to a nominal assessment.

Support for an assessment on oil and CBD related products was most intense with over 50 percent of those respondents strongly agreeing on the need for an assessment to conduct research, promotion and education. Nearly 50 percent of all respondents surveyed voiced support of an assessment on fiber products followed by roughly the same level of support for seed and grain products.

 

5. For our purposes, can you please describe your role in the industrial hemp industry?

 

 

Nearly half of those surveyed were hemp farmers. The next highest level of responses was from those who process CBD and retail locations.

 

CONCLUSION:

The survey responses were favorable to a hemp checkoff with well over two-thirds of respondents strongly agreeing with the essence of a checkoff, the need for more research, for greater promotion of the industry, and for greater consumer education of the hemp industry.

While the intensity was slightly less in favor of those who strongly agree on the need for a nominal assessment, two-thirds of respondents did show support for a nominal assessment of less than one percent of the value of their crops to fund industry research, promotion and consumer education with roughly half of respondents strongly agreeing with that statement.

MISCELLANEOUS OBSERVATIONS:

While the history of industrial hemp is measured in millennia, the industry in the U.S. is new.  New industries need innovation to develop better products and education to promote consumption.  Without this innovation and research, our nascent industry will continue to be at a competitive disadvantage against more established commodities in the marketplace.

There continues to be misunderstanding and myths surrounding checkoff programs. Specifically, amongst farmers, that a checkoff program is run by ‘outsiders’ and not farmers or those not contributing to the program. Further education needs to take place that the USDA Secretary of Agriculture appoints a board from those individuals and companies that contribute to the checkoff program.

Another misunderstanding is that a checkoff would benefit only one sector of the industry. For example, a company that manufactures hemp protein believed that a hemp checkoff would not benefit them, and only CBD companies.  A carefully constructed checkoff would work on behalf of all sectors of the hemp industry.

There is much work that needs to be done, but the initial sample of respondents shows that there is clear support for a national hemp checkoff program.

© 2021 National Industrial Hemp Council. All Rights Reserved.

 

 

 

WASHINGTON – National Industrial Hemp Council (NIHC) Board Chair Patrick Atagi, released the following statement after NIHC’s meeting with the Acting USDA Secretary:

“As we continue to lead the industry as the only D.C.-based hemp trade association, we felt it was important to update Acting Secretary Kevin Shea on a number of issues including consumer safety and climate smart agriculture. After today’s meeting, we’re confident that Secretary-designee Vilsack will be fully briefed on the issues facing the hemp industry.

“We urge the U.S. Senate to swiftly confirm Secretary-designee Vilsack’s nomination.”

 

For background:

The NIHC briefed the Acting USDA Secretary on the following issues:

  • Product certification and laboratory certification for hemp;
  • Delayed enforcement and corrections to specified provisions of the AMS rule on hemp;
  • Development of hemp checkoff program;
  • Trade protocols, standards and capacity-building for resin, nutritional and fiber hemp;
  • Increased R&D to identify competitive resin, nutritional and fiber uses;
  • Funding for export supply chain development;
  • Encourage FDA guidance on CBD;
  • Establishment of a Federal Advisory Committee (FACA) to advise Secretary on hemp issues.

 

About the National Industrial Hemp Council: The National Industrial Hemp Council provides high-quality networking and resources for its members, from farm to consumer. Its leadership is composed of leading international, federal, state, private industry, and government professionals throughout the sector. The organization is dedicated to furthering market development, assisting members in entering the industry, and educating consumers on industrial hemp and its applications. For more information, please go to www.hempindustrial.com

# # #

It’s been an exciting week in the Capitol. We’ve seen a time-honored tradition of a new Administration taking the reins of the federal government and with it comes new policy proposals.

We saw those changes take place immediately. On its first day in office, the Biden Administration directed the immediate halt of all Trump Administration policies that were currently under review and open for comment as traditionally occurs when a new administration takes office.

 

NEW ADMINISTRATION EFFECT ON HEMP REGS FROM USDA AND DEA

 

In regard to those policies that have been published in the Federal Register, but have yet to take effect, the Biden Administration is asking agencies to consider postponing the rules’ effective date for 60 days. For rules that have been published but have yet to take effect, the Biden Administration is asking federal agencies to consider opening the rule back up for a 30-day public comment period.

This notice would have no particular effect on the rule the Trump Administration published on January 19, 2021 titled Establishment of a U.S. Domestic Hemp Production Program as it is a final rule with an effective date of March 22, 2021, just beyond the 60 days mentioned above. Nevertheless, the new administration can freeze any rule it wants to, and we actually think there’s a decent probability that the new leadership will want to intervene and make further revisions to this rule before it goes into effect (be that by March 22, 2021 or a later date that they may choose to push back to).

With substantial concern still existing in regard to provisions of this rule, NIHC will be working with the new administration to advocate for any area which warrants adjustments within the legal authority that USDA has or with Congress to provide additional legal authority as needed. Should the agency decide to rescind the rule and re-open the public comment period, rest assured that the NIHC will be reaching out to our membership to solicit feedback.

Likewise, the rule issued a few months ago by the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) to implement the 2018 Farm Bill should not be affected by this customary regulatory freeze since it was issued as an interim final rule (IFR) with immediate legal effect.

 

PROSPECTS FOR FDA ACTION OR CONTINUED INACTION

 

Finally, we get asked a lot about our advocacy for an enforcement discretion policy at FDA. Since the FDA never moved forward to finalize their draft policy, we’re still at the same place at the beginning of the Biden Administration that we were at the end of the Trump Administration: we’re waiting for the FDA to act.

We continue to believe that the inaction of the FDA on this critical issue is unacceptable and a failure of the agency to complete its most basic duty to protect public health. However, this inaction is representative of inherent problems with the agency and does not appear to be something that will change due to new political leadership. Unfortunately, the change in administration is likely to do nothing but add further delays – particularly as the agency waits for the Senate to confirm a full time Commissioner to lead the agency’s policy direction.

 

NEW AGENCY HEADS AND CABINET YET TO BE NAMED

 

A new administration always names a host of new agency leads and while the Biden Administration has designated cabinet secretaries, the U.S. Senate has yet to confirm all but one of President Biden’s cabinet. Until that time each agency is led by career civil servants. A list of acting Secretaries currently leading federal agencies can be found here. Kevin Shea, the Associate Administrator at the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) will be leading the USDA as acting Secretary until the Senate confirms former Obama Administration USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack, who President Biden has renamed to serve in his prior post.

Trump-era FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn resigned this week and has been replaced by Janet Woodcock who is now leading the FDA in an acting capacity. POLITICO reports that the FDA “is among a second wave of positions that could take months to move through Senate confirmation.” Under consideration for nomination to this post is Woodcock, former Obama Administration FDA official Josh Sharfstein, and current Principal Deputy Commissioner of Food and Drugs, Amy P. Abernethy.

It’s worth noting that in July, Dr. Abernethy participated in an exclusive NIHC led discussion with hemp industry leaders in her capacity as head of FDA’s CBD Working Group to discuss our recommendations for an enforcement discretion policy on CBD.

It’s an exciting time to be in Washington and we’re anxious to continue working on your behalf to solidify the voice of hemp with the new Biden Administration.

Hemp Building Materials Have Big Role to Play in Environmental Renewal

Robert Ziner, the CEO of the Canadian Industrial Hemp Corporation (CIHC) writes this week in Hemp Today:

“According to the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the conventional building sector contributes up to 30% of total annual greenhouse gas emissions globally. Left unchecked, those emissions will more than double in the next 20 years. Hemp can help.”

You can read the full article here.

Commercial Industrial Hemp Clears Another Hurdle in Kansas

Alice Manatee of The Hutchinson News in Kansas writes about the implementation of the hemp program in the Sunflower State:

“The Kansas Department of Agriculture held an open meeting on Jan. 20 to consider the adoption of a proposed regulation to govern commercial industrial hemp production in Kansas. KDA proposed amendments to the Act, K.A.R. 4-34-1, to better align with the requirements of the 2018 Farm Bill and the Commercial Industrial Hemp Act, which allows commercial hemp production in Kansas.”

You can read the full story here.

Hemp Growers Still Face a Number of Questions in Their Communities

The Albany Herald (GA) covers a study out of the University of Georgia’s College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences faculty Benjamin Campbell and Julie Campbell in collaboration with Adam Rabinowitz at Auburn University. The survey asked respondents about the growing of hemp and the creation of hemp products in the areas in which they live.

You can read the article in the Albany Herald here. The original study was published in the Journal of Agriculture and Applied Economics which you can read here.

Few Steps Remaining To Open Industrial Hemp Farming In South Dakota

South Dakota’s KCCR-AM interviews Katie Sieverding, Executive Director of the South Dakota Industrial Hemp Association about the new USDA rule and the next steps for South Dakota’s state-based hemp regulations.

You can listen to the interview on KCCR-AM’s webpage here.
[/av_textblock]

This week, NIHC proudly announced a partnership and welcomed its newest member Food Safety Net Services (FSNS) to its ranks.

FSNS has been a leader in safeguarding our nation’s food supply through its network of accredited laboratories. With a cornerstone focused on safety, FSNS continues to strategically expand national services for food safety, consumer products and nutraceuticals.

We connected with Barry Carpenter, Senior Advisor for Regulatory Affairs & Client Relations for FSNS to ask more about the company and its role in the industry, and, of course, the value they see in NIHC efforts.

Carpenter (left) has held some very prestigious prior roles in his career. He served for over ten years as the CEO of the North American Meat Institute (NAMI) where he worked closely with government regulators, including new food safety regulations and marketing. He also served for nearly 15 years as the Deputy Administrator for the USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service, where he oversaw commodity checkoff programs. While at USDA, he represented the United States on the United Nation’s Committee on Agriculture from 1990 until 2006.

With all this experience, Carpenter brings sage insight into the potential and future of the hemp industry. Here are his thoughts.

Checkoff programs provide the resources necessary to develop markets, build consumer confidence, conduct research and provide industry education. These are critical areas of need for the hemp industry.”

What encouraged FSNS to become a patron sponsor of the NIHC?

FSNS recognized that NIHC was optimally positioned to provide leadership for the hemp industry, through their engagement with producers and processors. Further, their Board of Directors has considerable experience and success working with Congress as well as federal and state regulators.

What plans does FSNS have that is making it a leader in safety of this growing industry?

FSNS has 27 years of experience supporting the food and beverage industry. Knowing safety is paramount to gain the confidence of consumers, FSNS will rely on the consistency and credibility of their processes and methodologies to enhance the industry’s image in the marketplace.

What type of standards do you believe need to be had for the CBD industry?

Cannabidiol is very complex! The array of products currently being produced along with new products being developed number in the thousands. The sooner federal and state regulators will establish safety standards, the better. The industry will respond to marketplace demands to establish standards for product quality and consistency. As the market matures, users of CBD will demand certain product attributes, and industry standards will evolve.

How do you see what FSNS does in other areas of food safety translating to making sure consumers have safe CBD?

FSNS has a team of highly skilled scientists and technicians that are continually working to improve methods and processes. Further, they rely on internal controls and outside audits to verify their performance. Processors will build their reputation and brand identity by providing consumers with safe products that consistently meet their expectations. FSNS provides those support services to the food and beverage industry and will do the same for the CBD industry.

As you’re aware, NIHC is also pursuing a checkoff program for hemp. Considering your prior work with the USDA under the Agricultural Marketing Service with oversight of checkoff programs, what challenges do you see for the hemp industry in establishing a checkoff program?

The major challenge faced by all new checkoff programs is getting buy-in from the producers and processors.  Drivers of the checkoff program will need to educate the producers so they are willing to take a leap of faith, and ultimately realize a return on their investment.

How do you believe a hemp checkoff program would help the industry?

Checkoff programs provide the resources necessary to develop markets, build consumer confidence, conduct research and provide industry education. These are critical areas of need for the hemp industry.

Barry, you have been a leader for many years in other industries to build momentum and encourage strict standards, as well as achieved much within your government work. With all that context, what excites you the most about the potential of the hemp industry, both within the U.S. and globally? 

The growth potential for hemp products is enormous. The industry has only scratched the surface of potential products and uses for the many derivatives of hemp. As the industry becomes more organized and focused, the growth will be astronomical. I am especially excited to help NIHC be a significant part of this transition.

What short- or long-term obstacles do you see that the industry should work to overcome?

Short-term, the industry needs to invest in research to provide regulators with the information they need to establish safety standards. Concurrently, sampling and testing methodologies need to be validated and standardized.

Long-term, the industry needs to work towards providing more clarity and consistency on product performance.  Further, to be successful long term, the industry needs to focus on efficiencies and new technologies in the production and processing sectors to enhance sustainability.

 

WASHINGTON – The Chairman of the Board of the National Industrial Hemp Council Patrick Atagi was appointed yesterday to the Agricultural Technical Advisory Committee (ATAC) for Trade in Tobacco, Cotton and Peanuts by United States Department of Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue and United States Trade Representative (USTR) Robert Lighthizer.

“I want to thank outgoing USDA Secretary Sonny Perdue for his confidence and look to working with Biden Administration Secretary-designate Tom Vilsack and USTR-designate Katherine Tai,” said Atagi. “It’s an honor to be asked to serve and I look forward to representing the hemp industry.”

The Agricultural Technical Advisory Committee is comprised of senior representatives from across the U.S. agricultural community who provide advice to the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative on trade policy matters including the operation of existing trade agreements and the negotiation of new agreements. Members of the six Agricultural Technical Advisory Committees (ATACs) provide technical advice and guidance from the perspective of their specific product sectors.

The ATAC for Tobacco, Cotton and Peanuts scope is to advise, consult with, and make recommendations to the Secretary of Agriculture and USTR on matters that are of concern to the United States and to its consumers, producers, processors, and traders of tobacco, cotton and peanuts in connection with the trade policy activities undertaken by the United States. The committee also provides advice and information regarding trade issues that affect both domestic and foreign production and trade concerning tobacco, cotton and peanuts; and, furnishes advisory opinions and reports regarding trade policy as requested by the Secretary of Agriculture and the United States Trade Representative, or their designees.

This makes the second NIHC board member to be appointed by the Secretary of Agriculture and the USTR to the ATAC. Kevin Latner, who also serves as NIHC’s Sr. VP for Trade was appointed in July of 2020 to the ATAC for processed foods which provides input for policy on processed products such as CBD and hemp-derived foods.

About the National Industrial Hemp Council: The National Industrial Hemp Council provides high-quality networking and resources for its members, from farm to consumer. Its leadership is composed of leading international, federal, state, private industry, and government professionals throughout the sector. The organization is dedicated to furthering market development, assisting members in entering the industry, and educating consumers on industrial hemp and its applications. For more information, please go to www.hempindustrial.com

# # #

NIHC Becomes First Hemp Organization Officially Recognized by USDA Foreign Agricultural Service as MAP Partner

WASHINGTON – National Industrial Hemp Council today announced it received $200,000 in U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Market Access Program (MAP) funding to support export market development of industrial hemp.

“We are grateful for USDA confidence and the recognition of NIHC as the industry leader in industrial hemp trade and marketing,” said Kevin Latner, NIHC’s Senior Vice President for Trade and Marketing who will be responsible for implementing the program.  “Today’s announcement makes NIHC a trusted partner to USDA for hemp fiber, feed, food and CBD companies looking to break down trade barriers in markets overseas.”

MAP funds are administered through USDA’s Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS). Through the MAP program, FAS partners with U.S. agricultural trade associations, cooperatives, state regional trade groups and small businesses to share the costs of overseas marketing and promotional activities that help build commercial export markets for U.S. agricultural products and commodities. These funds can be used for facilitating trade missions and meeting with industry stakeholders and government regulators overseas.

NIHC programs will focus on Europe and China and include market research, trade policy and trade facilitation.  The global industrial hemp and products market was estimated at $11.1 billion in retail sales in 2019.  With an annual growth rate of 52 percent, driven by continued strength in textiles, food and industrial uses and hemp-derived cannabidiol (CBD), the global market is forecast to be worth $89 billion by 2025.

Hemp for industrial use, textile and CBD market is expected to quickly expand and be the primary driver of global industry growth.  By 2021, the global trade of hemp is forecast $8.1 billion across all markets, representing a three-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 83 percent.  Europe, China, and Canada are currently the primary sources of industrial hemp.  With the passage of the 2018 Farm Bill, the U.S. has become the world’s third largest producer of industrial hemp.

Europe has rapidly developed a robust hemp and CBD market.  Europe is also a strong producer of industrial use hemp products with $424 million in industrial product sales. China has led global markets in textiles with almost 80 percent of the $1.7 billion hemp textile market, in 2019.

In addition, National Industrial Hemp Council members will now have unprecedented access to United States trade negotiators; foreign government counterparts; and a network of international hemp industry association counterparts. Foreign governments understand that NIHC is now supported by the U.S. government and represents U.S. industry interests.

Market Access Program funds can be used by NIHC throughout the world to support market access and trade policy work, international trade promotion including supporting business-to-business facilitation, and consumer and brand marketing.

MAP funds for 2021 will be administered to NIHC through the Food Export Association of the Midwest USA.    

 “We’re extremely confident and trust that NIHC will represent the best interests of U.S. industrial hemp abroad. We’re excited to be working with them as part of the USDA cooperator community,” said Tim Hamilton, Executive Director of Food Export Association of the Midwest USA.

About the National Industrial Hemp Council: The National Industrial Hemp Council provides high-quality networking and resources for its members, from farm to consumer. Its leadership is composed of leading international, federal, state, private industry, and government professionals throughout the sector. The organization is dedicated to furthering market development, assisting members in entering the industry, and educating consumers on industrial hemp and its applications. For more information please go to www.hempindustrial.com.

 # # #

NIHC We wanted to let you know that we just got off of a Zoom call this afternoon with Acting USDA Secretary Kevin Shea.  Acting Secretary Shea was kind enough to give some NIHC board members, some members of our staff and our Government Affairs Committee Co-Chair 30 minutes to talk about the hemp industry.

We briefed him on our interpretation of the recent ruling by USDA on the establishment of a domestic hemp production program, gave an update on the status of the hemp checkoff program, and shared our thoughts on consumer safety and the important role hemp production can play for rural economies and climate-smart agriculture.

Without a Senate-confirmed USDA Secretary, Shea was appointed Acting Secretary by President Biden on the first day of the new administration and is leading all USDA efforts in the interim. He confirmed for us that he would be sharing our briefing materials directly with former USDA Secretary and current Secretary-designee Tom Vilsack once he’s sworn in.

It’s a huge victory for our industry that NIHC was able to brief USDA at the highest level.

Regards,

Larry Farnsworth
President
Gavel Public Affairs
(703) 489-9633
www.gavelpa.com

NIHC continues our work to serve as a credible resource to government officials in developing sound, common-sense regulations of America’s hemp economy. As part of those efforts, we have continued to engage the U.S. Senate Committee on Agriculture on a range of issues that have the potential to be included in 2023 farm bill development and negotiations anticipated to begin as early as this fall.

Relating to this, and to language in FY22 Appropriations bill extending 2014 Farm Bill authorities for another year through 2022, NIHC has been asked by Senate Ag committee staff to solicit feedback and comments from state regulators. This will help them compile the comments on what is and isn’t working in their state hemp plans under the 2014 pilot authority and the 2018 authority, as implemented by the USDA Final Rule.

On September 18, NIHC staff and members of our Government Affairs committee will be attending the annual meeting of the National Association of State Departments of Agriculture (NASDA) in Louisville, Kentucky. At NASDA’s meeting, NIHC will have a breakout room available to us to meet with individual states to hear their concerns and discuss proposed solutions. After NASDA’s annual meeting, NIHC will compile comments from state regulators and deliver them to Senate Ag committee staff.

This is a value-add to the hemp industry as a whole and NIHC is proud to lead these efforts and be your voice to the Senate Ag Committee, NASDA and the states that we believe will deliver workable solutions that will create a hemp economy that works for everyone.

If you plan to be at the NASDA meeting and would like to meet with NIHC to discuss how hemp is being regulated in your state, please contact Grace Johnson at gjohnson@hempindustrial.com so we can deliver your feedback to Washington and make sure your voice is heard on Capitol Hill.