Shawn Hauser discusses the Hemp Road Traveled and the Road of Infrastructure Ahead

 

Shawn Hauser is partner in Vicente Sederberg LLP, as well as chair of the firm’s Hemp and Cannabinoids Department, where she helps cannabis and hemp businesses navigate the intersection – and often collision – between state and federal law. Her practice helps companies comply with hemp laws, food and drug laws, regulations and licensing, as well as provides them general business representation. “This is unique to our practice,” says Hauser. “By providing clients compliance guidance with state hemp and cannabis laws and an understanding of how cannabis laws may evolve, we help guide them into a more stable and successful future.”

Hauser has been in the cannabis space for almost 12 years. “After graduating from college at the University of Texas, I had a passion to get involved with cannabis reform. I come from multi-generations of psychiatrists who have been dedicated to mental health care, and understood that cannabis is often a safer and more effective treatment to treat many mental health conditions, but that the law needed to change to allow doctors to utilize and understand cannabis as medicine.”

Hauser came to Colorado in 2008 in the early days when caregivers of patients who were receiving medical cannabis treatment lacked a supporting legal system. “I began work on the legalization campaign when I met the partners from McAllister, Darnell & Gottlieb PC who were also working on the issue. They built the firm around it in 2010 and I joined as an associate attorney,” Hauser says. The firm was one of the first marijuana-focused law firms in Colorado.

In 2013, Hauser joined Vicente Sederberg where she continued her work. The firm set out to help shape laws that would work to create a responsible cannabis industry and included hemp. “In 2012, founders of the law firm were key drafters of Colorado’s Amendment 64 which legalizes marijuana possession for adults under state law and requires the state to establish a regulatory structure for retail marijuana. In that framework, we included the state legalization of industrial hemp.”

From that foundation, the firm has built a thriving hemp practice, which grew exponentially with the passage of 2018 Farm Bill. “In the hemp department, we do a great deal of policy work all over the country in addition to legal services, such testifying to the FDA as to the regulation of CBD, advising states in how to regulate hemp-derived cannabinoids in FDA’s absence, and addressing best practices for consumer safety,” says Hauser. “One of our goals is to see the FDA step up. We are passionate to ensure that hemp products are regulated appropriately and responsibility, and appreciate that the federal regulation of hemp sets the table for how all cannabis may be most appropriately regulated.”

 

“One of our goals is to see the FDA step up. We are passionate to ensure that hemp products are regulated appropriately and responsibility, and appreciate that the federal regulation of hemp sets the table for how all cannabis may be most appropriately regulated.”

 

“We do a lot of work with other industry stakeholders and have key alliances that complement our regulatory practice, such as our close alliance with Kleinfeld, Kaplan and Becker,” says Hauser of the Washington D.C.-based law firm who focuses their practice on Food & Drug Law and Advertising Law.

In the meantime, while all that comes to fruition, the firm helps clients navigate the patchwork of state regulations for cannabis and hemp. There are a lot of moving parts and complicated federal, state, and local laws relevant to setting up an industrial hemp or cannabis-based business.

“Usually, a client comes to us because they are in hemp supply chain, as a farmer, retailer or brand, and they want to know how to be compliant at the federal level in the light of the Farm Bill, as well as with the FDA and within the complexity of state laws,” says Hauser. She notes that businesses have more to consider than a normal business. They must set up proper corporate entities, negotiate contracts, ensure that business insurance is adequate (watching for exclusions unique to the industry), review marketing materials including product packaging and labeling, develop products within tight legal parameters, complete various safety studies, manage ingredients properly, set up proper production and supply and distribution chains that are complaint, and mitigate the unique risk inherent in the cannabis industry. There are also the environmental laws to be followed, especially on industrial hemp production. It is quite complex.

“The good news is that Colorado continues to serve as a model state for others to follow,” says Hauser. “We are leading the way in hemp. Our governor has done an outstanding job to help us get leaps ahead from when we started. We have a level of infrastructure, agency expertise, and informed and effective rulemaking processes that is unparalleled, with state leadership and industry dedicate to having the most responsible and effective robust hemp program. Governor Polis has organized stakeholder groups for every aspect. Top universities and ag folks are quickly taking things to next level. We are bolstering state industrial hemp companies through incentives to build processing facilities in Colorado to make things like concrete and hemp plastics, all game changing for the planet and industry.”

Once the federal framework is complete, Hauser sees the U.S. as a major market on the world hemp stage. But the road to accomplishing this is slowly working its way out in equalizing state to state in the rules for production and sale of consumer products, and in developing the infrastructure and research needed to support a true industrial hemp industry. “Hemp having varying sets of rules for production and sale state to state is one the industry’s biggest barriers. The failure of the FDA to effectively regulate products leaves an emerging market without regulation to guide it,” she says.

“Right now, with CBD and consumable hemp product regulations, many states regulations conflict with federal law, but federal law is generally not enforced absent companies making serious drug claims,” says Hauser. It makes it difficult for states to enforce, creates unique legal exposure to businesses who follow federal lay but violate state law or vice versa. It also makes investors leery, creating banking and insurance conflicts.

In the future that Hauser is advocating for she sees a healthier hemp world. “I see federal legalization and development of a vibrant U.S. cannabis and hemp industry that includes broader acceptance of cannabis as medicine and as an alternative to alcohol, as well as a healthy dietary supplement, ingredient in foods and cosmetics as appropriate, and a natural alternative to more harmful ingredients currently used. Hemp is revolutionary and can be used in animal feed, plastics, fuel, all kinds of products. It can have a role in reversing climate change. There are so many uses, we have only seen the tip of the iceberg.”

 

A funny thing happened on the race to the bottom recently with respect to hemp biomass and processed material pricing, pricing has stabilized, at least for now. This is an important development for both farmers and processors who have spent the last two years scrambling to make ends meet.

The stable prices, first reported by PanXchange (https://panxchange.com/panxchange-hemp-benchmarks-analysis-april-2021/) , came as a surprise as the hemp industry entered the 2021 planting season with an estimated 201 million pounds of excess biomass and inventories of distillate and isolate bloated. Given that prices had fallen heading in to January, seeing prices stabilize in April and May seem counterintuitive, yet promising.

What is driving this leveling? Some analysts attribute this to the increased demand for smokable flower, while others are suggesting that demand for biomass and processed materials to support delta-8 demand may be the culprit. Regardless, the question now is whether this is finally the floor in pricing or is it just a bubble that will soon burst with further price declines in tow.

Stable prices, if it continues, are good for the industry as it makes operations and sales more predictable. It also gives cultivators and processors more security, especially heading into this planting season. For those cultivating and processing that have buyers, it would be best to lock in prices via a contract. Based on the PanXchange report, “Looking ahead, expect to see premiums inch up for higher quality products.” The key word here is quality. For those trying to unload lower quality products on a fire sale, there will still need to be a street fighter mentality when it comes to pricing and competitiveness.

On the other hand, if this is a bubble, and prices start falling again, then it will continue to reap havoc throughout the supply chain. Investors will be hesitant to invest citing increased risk and difficulty in modelling the business, product manufacturers and processors will hold off placing orders waiting for lower prices and cultivators will continue to end up holding the bag. The market will seize up.

Regardless, there is a window of opportunity here for those operators who have struggled for the past three years. Our advice, get while the getting is good. For those entrepreneurs who have remained steadfast in the industry, this may be the light at the end of the tunnel.

Enjoy this respite, there is more work ahead heading into year 3.

May 14, 2021

 

For years, industrial hemp has played an important role in our nation’s history. From the colonial times when hemp was top cash crop to the 20th century when parachutes used during the D-Day invasion were made from hemp. Today, industrial hemp is used as a fiber to make clothes; it’s used in the car manufacturing process, it can also build buildings and pave roads; and it is widely used for nutrition and wellness in foods, cosmetics and dietary supplements. There is no other commodity on the market that has such a diverse range of use.

Hemp is a non-intoxicating crop that was officially legalized under Federal law when the 2018 Farm Bill was signed into law. Subsequently, tens of thousands of acres have been licensed throughout our country for hemp production by states, territories and tribes as prescribed by law.

Hemp is not intoxicating because the tetrahydrocannabinols in the plant—namely Delta-8 THC and Delta-9 THC—are in such minuscule concentrations that they have no psychoactive effect.  When Congress legalized hemp they specified that all hemp products contain no more than 0.3% Delta-9 THC, thus ensuring that no products would contain intoxicating levels of that compound, but the statutory definition was (and remains) silent on the less-intoxicating Delta-8, perhaps because the plant produces it in much smaller quantities than Delta-9. Unfortunately, some in our industry are exploiting that loophole to artificially produce Delta-8 THC in very high concentrations that are orders of magnitude greater than what can feasibly be extracted and concentrated from the plant, let alone found in it naturally.

While NIHC welcomes efforts to address the Delta-8 problem, HB 3000 is chock-full of unintended consequences that would actually open the door to Delta-8 products produced out of state while also effectively decimating Oregon’s own legitimate hemp industry.

NIHC remains steadfast in our position and want to make it abundantly clear to the Oregon state legislature: we believe that psychoactive concentrations of Delta-8 THC should not be allowed into the market as hemp, just as Delta-9 is not. This is one of the main reasons why NIHC continues to urge Congress to modify the federal definition of hemp to include all tetrahydrocannabinols, in line with the recent bipartisan proposal by the National Association of State Departments of Agriculture (NASDA), which would settle this problem conclusively.

However, the bill, H.B. 3000 being considered by the Oregon state legislature unfortunately would not. While NIHC welcomes efforts to address the Delta-8 problem, HB 3000 is chock-full of unintended consequences that would actually open the door to Delta-8 products produced out of state while also effectively decimating Oregon’s own legitimate hemp industry. This is largely due to the provisions in its Section 17, which would require all hemp products for human consumption to be processed and sold only through marijuana manufacturers and dispensaries. The real-world consequence of this would be that Oregon consumers, including teenagers, will turn to on-line purchases from out of state for delivery to doorsteps all across Oregon, not only for hemp products but also Delta-8, while major brands like Sephora, which has popularized CBD-infused cosmetics, would not be able to sell products at their retail locations in Oregon.

NIHC certainly agrees with legislators seeking to keep intoxicating products out of the hands of minors. We also believe in stronger regulations and enforcement measures that would close the Delta-8 loophole of bad actors trying to cash in on the legalization of industrial hemp. But this bill is not the answer; the answer is to enact a change in the Federal definition of hemp to keep Delta-8 out of the hemp market. And while awaiting that change we would encourage Oregon legislators to prohibit Delta-8 at the product level instead, which is a sensible approach to restricting Delta-8 in the marketplace while allowing Oregon’s legitimate hemp industry to remain viable.

NIHC recently spoke with Mackenzie Schoonmaker (at right), Principal, BEVERIDGE & DIAMOND PC, to discuss how they are helping businesses make their way through the complexity of state and federal laws to achieve their goals in the industrial hemp space. Beveridge & Diamond is also a sponsor of NIHC’s 2021 Hemp Business Summit, November 14-16 in Washington DC. Here is what she had to share.

How did you or your firm come to be members of NIHC?

Beveridge & Diamond has a decades-long practice supporting businesses in the agriculture industry on environmental issues. With the legalization of hemp in the U.S. in 2018, it was a no-brainer to evolve our practice to support hemp producers. As we evaluated associations to join to support our growing practice, NIHC was an obvious choice given its focus on growers of industrial hemp.

What value do you see being a part of this organization?

NIHC has given us several opportunities to speak at conferences, present webinars, and publish articles and blog posts on federal and state-level environmental issues facing the hemp industry. For example, during our first year of membership in 2019, we had the privilege of presenting at the 2019 NIHC Hemp Business Summit. NIHC has also helped us expand our relationships in the hemp industry, and more importantly, given us the chance to learn directly from hemp producers about what challenges are top of mind for them so that we can better serve our clients. B&D is excited to be a sponsor of the upcoming 2021 NIHC Hemp Business Summit.

Tell us about your firm.

B&D’s more than 120 lawyers across the U.S. focus on environmental and natural resources law and litigation. We help clients around the world resolve critical environmental and sustainability issues relating to their products, facilities, and operations.

What is the nature of your work within the Industrial Hemp industry?

B&D’s Industrial Hemp & Cannabis industry group assists growers, manufacturers, and suppliers of cannabis and cannabis products and ancillary businesses that support the industry (such as product packaging suppliers and manufacturers of fertilizers, pesticides, and plant nutrients) with federal and state-level environmental compliance, product liability, project planning, environmental risk avoidance, and, when appropriate, litigation and defense against state-level environmental enforcement actions. For example, we advised a bast fiber producer on environmental regulations regarding hemp seeds, and for an agricultural organization we drafted comments on the on the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Interim Final Regulations on the Establishment of a Domestic Hemp Production Program.

What do you see are the biggest obstacles and opportunities for the hemp industry?

As the hemp industry expands, it will have to navigate a complex framework of U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and other federal and state level requirements. We expect the hemp industry, like comparable industries, will become a highly regulated space.

However, the opportunities that are fueling this expansion will only increase. As companies respond to growing consumer demands for sustainably-sourced materials, clothing and textile manufacturers are turning to using hemp in their products. With the threat of climate change, climate-smart agriculture (such as hemp) is even more important. And, hemp-derived CBD products are becoming more pervasive, as scientific research is ongoing regarding CBD’s potential to treat various health issues.

Where do you see the industry in 5 years, either from a regulatory or business aspect, or both? How will you or the firm have a role in that development?

As noted above, we believe the industry will only continue to grow (pardon the pun!) into a ubiquitous industry subject to the same regulations as other agricultural products. Given our deep experience supporting the ag industry on environmental, health, and safety issues, B&D is well-positioned to help hemp businesses anticipate and comply with those environmental regulations without hindering business operations and growth.

Any other comments that NIHC members should know about you?

B&D regularly publishes news alerts about environmental developments relevant to the hemp industry, and you may sign up to receive them here. We welcome the opportunity to meet more NIHC members and hope you don’t hesitate to reach out!

You can reach the firm at https://www.bdlaw.com.

Levi’s Commitment to Sustainable Agriculture an Example to Corporate America

It’s been a slow week in Washington DC with Congress on recess and an absence of activity happening at the regulatory level in recent weeks. However, the market never takes a recess as it continues to recognize the consumers preference for sustainability and corporate responsibility.

Case in point, Levi Strauss Company late last month unveiled its “Buy Better, Wear Longer” campaign to address how consumers buy too many clothes; don’t wear them long enough; and, eventually discard garments. The company believes this practice leads to greater pollution and environmental unsustainability.

“Ultimately, Levi’s® denim is meant to be worn for generations, not seasons,” Jen Sey, brand president of Levi’s, said in the companies press release kick starting the campaign.

One of the commitments to sustainability practices that Levi’s has made is offering products derived from hemp fiber. Their goals are to reduce the overall impact on climate with more sustainable production practices. This includes investing in new materials (i.e. hemp) and new production practices such as their new “Water<Less” technology. While it’s good to hear Levi’s making that kind of commitment, it’s having an even larger effect than the even the company might realize.

Levi’s says in their press release announcing the “Buy Better, Wear Longer” campaign that their manufacturing practices have resulting in the saving of nearly 4 billion liters of water and it has led to the recycling of nearly 10 billion more liters. That’s just for the manufacturing process and by using hemp as a fiber; the company is also seeing affects at the farm.

In comments filed to the USDA last week, NIHC recommended that the USDA take a science-driven approach to hemp and consider data that shows hemp is a less water intensive textile. We can find the data by looking to partners in Europe. For example, the Stockholm Environment Institute says that growing hemp requires half as much water as cotton. Beyond reducing water usage, The European Industrial Hemp Association says that every 100 acres dedicated to hemp can sequester up to 15 tons of carbon dioxide.

Therefore, companies that are committed to sustainability initiatives like using less water and curbing carbon dioxide are also making a change further down the supply chain and potentially a greater impact than they might realize. At NIHC, we believe that’s a good thing.

“As a whole, ‘Buy Better, Wear Longer’ is meant to evoke a sustainable future where companies and consumers around the world come together to rethink fashion,” Levi’s says in a press release.  “And Levi’s® offers the kinds of products that are there with you for the long haul.”

And with those kinds of commitments, corporate America can ensure that it’s not just the products that are with us for the long haul, but the long-term health of our environment too.

To learn more about the Levi’s “Buy Better, Wear Longer” campaign and the company’s commitments to sustainability, click here.

To be a part of the discussion on the future of industrial hemp, make sure to register for NIHC’s 2021 Hemp Business Summit. Sustainability and other forward-thinking strategies will be the focus as we all continue make headway towards a vibrant and profitable industrial hemp economy.

NIHC Responds to USDA’s Request for Comments on Climate Smart Ag  

The National Industrial Hemp Council (NIHC) this week submitted official comments to the United States Department of Agriculture’s (USA) request for stakeholder feedback on developing climate smart agriculture practices and ways these practices can meet the needs of disadvantaged communities around the country.

“USDA is committed to addressing climate change through actions that are farmer, rancher, and forest landowner-focused and that create new market opportunities for the sector in a fair and equitable way,” said Vilsack at the time of release requesting comments. “We want your ideas on how to position the agriculture and forestry sectors to be leaders on climate smart practices to mitigate climate change. This includes making the most of USDA programs, developing new USDA-led climate strategies, strengthening existing markets and developing new markets that generate income.”

The NIHC provided detailed input in three areas the Secretary asked for and provided suggestions about how to better use existing USDA programs to address climate change through the U.S. domestic hemp industry. The three areas that NIHC provided information on include: climate-smart agriculture and forestry; biofuels, bioproducts, and renewable energy; and meeting the needs of disadvantaged communities through USDA’s climate strategy.

“NIHC is proud to represent the U.S. domestic hemp industry through our position as a government partner through USDA’s Market Access Program and serving on the Secretary’s technical advisory committees,” said NIHC Board Chair Patrick Atagi. “NIHC understands the USDA; it’s programs; how they work and our comments are a continuation of the constructive dialogue we’ve been having all year with USDA and the Biden Administration about how to make progress is reducing climate change.

To read the NIHC’s comments in full, please click here.

“Hemp is such an amazingly versatile commodity and when included in the appropriate framework of USDA’s programs, can really be the gold standard for climate smart agriculture,” Atagi concluded.

2021 Hemp Business Summit 
November 14-16, 2021 | Omni Shoreham Hotel – Washington D.C.

 

The NIHC is proud to present its second annual business summit, a remarkable event bringing together the hemp industry’s leading business, legal, and regulatory figures for pivotal discussions about developments in the world of hemp. The summit will provide invaluable educational and networking opportunities for those currently in or soon to be entering the industrial hemp industry.

”NIHC is excited to get back to in person meetings and we can’t wait to host everyone in our Nation’s Capital for what promises to be an exciting event,” said NIHC Board Chairman Patrick Atagi. “If you’re involved in the hemp industry, you won’t want to miss NIHC21.”
Dr. Jay Noller, Director of the Oregon State University Global Hemp Innovation Center (GHIC) is confirmed to attend and speak. Attendees will also hear from NIHC Chief Economist Beau Whitney who will be delivering must hear data on the state of the hemp economy. NIHC will be announcing other hemp industry leaders who will be speaking as they’re confirmed, so please continue to check your inbox for announcements as they come available.

“The 2019 NIHC Summit was a wonderful opportunity to meet and learn from a wide range of individuals regarding the business, science, and people behind the hemp industry. The event offered fantastic opportunities to gain knowledge and network with others interested in hemp,” said Lucy Infeld, Beveridge & Diamond P.C., NIHC member.

A limited number of early bird tickets are now available! The 2019 Hemp Business Summit sold out quickly, so act now! You can register at: https://hempindustrial.com/our-events/2021-hemp-business-summit/.

Registration pricing is as follows:

Early Bird Member – $495.00
Early Bird Non-Member – $795.00
Member Registration – $595.00
Non-Member Registration – $995.00

Sponsorship opportunities for #NIHC21 are also available. If you’re interested in partnering with NIHC for this exciting event, you can view sponsorship opportunities or email info@hempindustrial.com.

To Guarantee Your Spot, Register Today!

On Monday night, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the SAFE Banking Act with a bipartisan vote of 321-101 with all House Democrats voting in favor of the bill and 106 Republican members.

Last week, we wrote about our concerns with the legislation as it related to hemp. As we read the bill literally, Section 11 identifies “legitimate hemp-related businesses” as those being compliant with the 2018 Farm bill and subsequent regulations. NIHC’s concerns were about those states operating under 2014 Farm Bill authorities to establish hemp pilot programs, and whether or not the protections in the SAFE Banking Act apply to hemp produced under such programs and/or imported from abroad. If these protections are not made explicitly applicable, then businesses trading in hemp produced on over 70 percent of the licensed acres—including 4 of the 5 largest state programs—in the United States could be disqualified from participating in the banking system. Manufacturers that use imported hemp, such as major apparel brands that produce and sell clothing made with imported hemp, could be disqualified from banking services as well.

The NIHC believes the SAFE Banking Act is a good bill. We understand the reasons for the bill, and we agree with them. However, we believe this good bill can be made even better by eliminating any ambiguity that arises from those who may misinterpret the legislative text as excluding the overwhelming majority of businesses in our industry.

The NIHC believes the SAFE Banking Act is a good bill. We understand the reasons for the bill, and we agree with them. However, we believe this good bill can be made even better by eliminating any ambiguity that arises from those who may misinterpret the legislative text as excluding the overwhelming majority of businesses in our industry.

We have been working this issue on Capitol Hill speaking with the authors of this bill in both the House and the Senate. We particularly want to thank Congressman Ed Perlmutter (D-CO) who wrote this bill in the House for being open to hearing NIHC’s concerns.

This legislation now moves to the U.S. Senate and the NIHC will continue to be engaged on this issue.

For more on NIHC efforts on the SAFE Banking Act, read here.

istockphoto.com

At present, most if not all banking service providers take a risk-management approach to hemp business customers that presumes that they may be held liable for their clients’ compliance with USDA regulatory requirements, even though these laws have no explicit bearing on the legality of hemp in commerce. (All hemp is legal for commerce nationwide if it meets the statutory definition of hemp, without regard to the USDA Rule).

This creates an onerous burden on banking service providers and their clients that is a significant (perhaps the most significant) factor contributing to the refusal of many providers to offer services to hemp businesses, and explains the excessive fees charged by those providers who do choose to offer them. Thousands of hemp business all across the country contend with this issue, particularly with respect to obtaining payment processing for credit card transactions, which are the lifeblood for most hemp businesses.

These problems arise largely from the duality in current law pertaining to hemp: one legal standard for hemp products—the Federal definition of hemp in statute—and another for hemp production in the U.S.—the USDA Hemp Rule, which applies only for production on a small percentage of acres licensed for such production.

While NIHC remains hopeful that legislation will soon rectify this duality by redefining hemp such that the USDA Rule will be revised to reflect the same legal standard, this has yet to occur and this duality will nevertheless persist for products made before such a revision is enacted.

NIHC strongly supports the normalization of banking services for hemp businesses, and we welcome the concerted effort by proponents of the SAFE Banking Act to achieve this through the bill’s hemp provisions (Section 11).  Despite the unambiguous Federal legalization of hemp in 2018, businesses engaged in hemp commerce continue to face great difficulty accessing banking services due to the perceived lack of regulatory clarity. Even when businesses are able to access banking services, the costs are exorbitant—much like the struggles faced by businesses engaged in marijuana, which remains illegal under Federal law. By providing regulatory clarity to banking services providers, the bill would go a long way toward relieving these difficulties.

However, we are concerned that the bill’s definition of ‘hemp-related legitimate business’ will cause the bill to fall short in achieving this desired outcome. This is because the definition will exclude businesses that buy or sell hemp produced on 76% of the acres licensed for hemp nationwide and as hemp produced outside the U.S. That would significantly hinder the industry’s domestic growth and potentially erecting a technical barrier to trade (TBT) in hemp on the export market as well.

The problem presented by the proposed legislation is that hemp produced on 76% of the acres licensed for hemp nationwide in 2020 (including 4 of the country’s 5 largest state programs) is not subject to USDA regulations pursuant to the 2018 Farm Bill because they are in states currently under 2014 Farm Bill authorities for hemp production. Even after the 2014 authorities expire at the end of 2021 (unless Congress extends them again), hemp goods that were produced under 2014 authorities will remain lawfully in commerce long thereafter. Hemp produced outside the U.S. is also not subject to the USDA regulations.

Even though the definition states “where applicable,” this re-introduces the regulatory uncertainty that caused banking problem in the first place. Banking services will either continue to shun hemp businesses, or incur excessive costs for risk mitigation, based on the perceived hazard that the bill’s protections may not apply where the business engages in hemp whose production is not subject to the USDA regulations.

We also see cases where regulators themselves adopt a similar risk-mitigation posture. A case in point is the policy promulgated by USDA Rural Development that excludes hemp producers in 2014 Farm Bill states from eligibility for funding under the Value-Added Producers Grant program, thus depriving most of the industry and state economies of much-needed investment in hemp processing capacity.

If regulations issued by USDA are vulnerable to such misinterpretation, then regulations by other agencies with far less understanding of these complexities (such as those that will administer the SAFE Banking Act) are all too likely.

Ironically, without these technical corrections, the SAFE Banking Act could normalize banking services for legitimate marijuana commerce and fail to do so for most legitimate hemp commerce.

The NIHC continues to work with policy makers in both the House and the Senate to look for ways to make these technical changes become law.

When discussing the future of industrial hemp with Jamie Campbell Petty, Executive Director of the Midwest Hemp Council (MHC), it is hard not to get excited. Petty has become one of the Midwest’s most dedicated advocates to remove the barriers for farmers to grow industrial hemp, sinking her time and personal resources to establish the work she champions.

In 2010, this ex-military spouse returned to her Indiana roots, and began to build out her dream of a 20-acre hobby farm, that she and her husband, Guy, now share with family and friends. In 2013, Guy’s son, Justin, and his team at Recreator, began educating Jamie about hemp as a renewable and sustainable crop option. The hemp industry piqued her interest, and the rest has been a wild ride.

In her early advocating days, Jamie and her fellow volunteers began working with Purdue University’s Dr. Ron Turco and the Office of the Indiana State Chemist. The OISC is the regulatory body for the Indiana Hemp Program. Jamie soon met NIHC board member Bob White, Indiana Farm Bureau’s Director of National Government Relations. White, and then-INFB Policy Director Kyle Cline, took the time to work with Jamie as they all gathered information regarding the 2014 Farm Bill language and adopting INFB/AFBF policy language.

These connections began the thoughtful formation of the MHC when Petty and fellow co-founders Justin Swanson and Alan Kimbell saw the need to correct so many misconceptions about hemp fiber and cannabinoids from agricultural and regulatory agencies in her region, while working to improve the regulatory environment. Clear and consistent communication, as well as collaboration, were key to Midwest Hemp Council’s mission.

While the MHC embraces the potential of the whole hemp plant, which includes cannabinoids, grain and fiber, Petty believes the future for farmers to profit from the versatile crop lies on the industrial side, which is where she focuses most of her personal efforts.

“In the early days, it was so hard,” says Petty. “There were so many misconceptions. The Farm Bureau was not understanding the crop, so they were not publicly working on the issue, yet were instrumental in changing not only INFB’s policy, but that of the AFBF. The Indiana Department of Agriculture does not regulate, so they were not giving it attention. But, we were able to partner with Purdue University’s College of Agriculture to begin the work. Because of them and the Office of Indiana State Chemist, who regulates our agricultural laws, we were able to get the industry moving forward.”

With the help of dedicated volunteers, in early 2014, INHIA launched, just on the heels of Kentucky and Tennessee launching their chapters. Realizing they needed a broader platform to address inconsistent regulations across state lines, and the need for collaboration in building out the supply chain, they built the MHC and transitioned efforts into that organization with a focus on Indiana, dissolving the HIA chapter. “We originally remained very autonomous. We are a conservative state and cannot keep up with Tennessee and Kentucky, who are quicker to act. While we really desired regional collaboration, in the early days every state was working at their own pace.”

Today, the Midwest Hemp Council is a thriving organization with a clear mission to stand as a credible information center, a trusted policy advocate, and a dedicated forum for the hemp industry in Indiana and beyond. Their members come from every sector of the industry, promoting and building the whole hemp plant economy from seed to shelf. Justin Swanson, MHC President, has worked tirelessly alongside Petty to build a quality board and esteemed organization.

Recently, one of Petty’s only early supporters at the Indiana State Department of Agriculture, David King, has come along Midwest Hemp Council as a Strategic Partner and active contributor to the Board of Directors. King is now the principal of Hemp Products Store Brand Builders, with the focus on normalizing and streamlining the hemp product supply chain.

While based in Indiana, Petty believes the industry will not move forward without more collaboration between states and at the national level. “I team with other organizations in 23 states. There are many organizations, maybe too many, yet each brings something to the table. Industry consolidation of some of these will occur naturally, most likely, as the niche expands. Our current frustrations are with regulatory bodies, some do too much and FDA won’t act at all, which is why I believe collaboration is the key. We must be working together to achieve common goals.”

“We are a nascent industry,” emphasizes Petty. “We need clear and united objectives. Too many cooks in kitchen isn’t effective.”

MHC has accomplished much but suffered setbacks with COVID-19 and the fact that in the middle of growing season in 2019, Indiana criminalized the hemp flower when farmers had plants already in ground. Now, Indiana farmers have surplus CBD processed and sitting on shelves. Also in 2019, Hoosier farmers grew fiber under contracts which were later breached; however, since that time Marty Mahan of Heartland Hemp Coop, Petty and others have moved 90% of that hemp into the market, such that farmers did receive payment. 2019 was a year of “Life Lessons” across the U.S. for those involved in hemp.

Working to regroup, Petty says, “Right now, we are focused on positioning for the future, creating infrastructure and building solid contracts, primarily within industrial hemp. I, and others, envision at least one major grain and fiber hub within the state, that can service farmers in nearby states, with smaller, regional footprints across Indiana and the Midwest. I believe in the cannabinoid industry, but research and investment needs to go towards grain and fiber NOW – the cannabinoid industry has the infrastructure and market space.”

Being a part of the National Industrial Hemp Council (NIHC) is important to MHC, especially through their relationship with NIHC board member Bob White, who has become a great resource. “NIHC supports important initiatives on the national level,” Petty says. “Their focus is important and we believe it is worthwhile to collaborate with them on a larger scale.”

When asked where she sees the industry in five years, she says, “Five years is a good number. In five years, we hope to have significant supply chain remedies and infrastructure in place. It is currently a “chicken and egg” situation. People who want to invest need contracts. People who want contracts need infrastructure. We need brand builders. We need programs to normalize cannabinoids with the consumer and build grain and fiber opportunities, working through collaboration with retailers. I am proud to say that Midwest Hemp Council is working daily to find solutions to the supply chain.”

Once the industry begins to fill the holes in the supply chain, things will begin to function smoothly.

“When people express doubt, I refer them back to the soybean industry. I have elderly farmer friends who tell me that as children they had bales of soybean rotting in their barns. The market wasn’t developed. Now their grandchildren are farming and significantly profiting from corn and soybean. We may not have as large of market as the soybean industry for our farmers, but we have a much more diverse opportunity in resources and applications for hemp than any other crop.”